Criterion 2- Teaching- Learning and Evaluation

Metric No.	Description	Download
2.1.1	Due consideration is given to equity and inclusiveness by providing reservation of seats to all categories during the admission process. Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years	View
2.1.2	Average percentage of seats filled in for the various programmes as against the approved intake	View
2.1.3	Average percentage of Students enrolled demonstrates a national spread and includes students from other states	View
2.2.1	Average Percentage of fulltime teachers who received awards and recognitions for excellence in teaching, student mentoring, scholarships, professional achievements and academic leadership at State, National, International levels from Government / Government-recognized agencies / registered professional associations / academies during the last five years	View
2.2.2	Student – Fulltime teacher ratio (data for the preceding academic year)	View
2.3.1	Student-centric methods are used for enhancing learning experiences by:	View
2.3.2	Institution facilitates the use of Clinical Skills Laboratory / Simulation Based Learning	View
2.3.3	Teachers use ICT-enabled tools for effective teaching and learning process including online e-resources	View
2.3.4	Student :Mentor Ratio (preceding academic year)	View
2.3.5	The teaching learning process of the institution nurtures creativity,analytical skills and innovation among students	View
2.4.1	Average percentage of fulltime teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years	View
2.4.2	Average percentage of fulltime teachers with Ph.D./D.Sc./D.Lit./DM/M Ch/DNB in super specialities /other PG degrees (like MD/ MS/ MDS etc.,) in Health Sciences (like MD/ MS/MDS etc.,) for recognition as Ph.D guides as per the eligibility criteria stipulated by the Regulatory Councils/Affiliating Universities.	View
2.4.3	Average Teaching experience of fulltime teachers in number of years (data for the preceding academic year)	View
2.4.4	Average percentage of teachers trained for development and delivery of e-content / e-courses during the last 5 years	View
2.4.5	Average Percentage of fulltime teachers who received awards and recognitions for excellence in teaching, student mentoring, scholarships, professional achievements and academic leadership at State, National, International levels from Government / Government-recognized agencies / registered professional associations / academies during the last five years	View
2.5.1	The Institution adheres to the academic calendar for the conduct of Continuous Internal Evaluation and ensures that it is robust and transparent	View
2.5.2	Mechanism to deal with examination-related grievances is transparent, time-bound and efficient	View
2.5.3	Reforms in the process and procedure in the conduct of evaluation/examination; including the automation of the examination system	View
2.5.4	The Institution provides opportunities to students for midcourse improvement of performance through specific interventions	View
2.6.1	The Institution has stated the learning outcomes (generic and programme-specific) and graduate attributes as per the provisions of the Regulatory bodies and the University; which are communicated to the students and teachers through the website and other documents	View
2.6.2	Incremental performance in Pass percentage of final year students in the last five years	View
2.6.3	The teaching learning and assessment processes of the Institution are aligned with the stated learning outcomes.	View
2.6.4	Presence and periodicity of parent-teachers meetings, remedial measures undertaken and outcome analysis	View
2.7.1	Online student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning process	View