Criterion 2- Teaching- Learning and Evaluation

Metric No.DescriptionDownload
2.1.1Due consideration is given to equity and inclusiveness by providing
reservation of seats to all categories during the admission process.
Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various
categories as per applicable reservation policy during the last five
years		View
2.1.2Average percentage of seats filled in for the various programmes as
against the approved intake		View
2.1.3Average percentage of Students enrolled demonstrates a national
spread and includes students from other states		View
2.2.1Average Percentage of fulltime teachers who received awards
and recognitions for excellence in teaching, student mentoring,
scholarships, professional achievements and academic
leadership at State, National, International levels from
Government / Government-recognized agencies / registered
professional associations / academies during the last five years
View
2.2.2Student – Fulltime teacher ratio (data for the preceding academic year)View
2.3.1Student-centric methods are used for enhancing learning experiences
by:		View
2.3.2Institution facilitates the use of Clinical Skills Laboratory / Simulation
Based Learning		View
2.3.3Teachers use ICT-enabled tools for effective teaching and learning
process including online e-resources		View
2.3.4Student :Mentor Ratio (preceding academic year)View
2.3.5The teaching learning process of the institution nurtures creativity,
analytical skills and innovation among students		View
2.4.1Average percentage of fulltime teachers against sanctioned posts
during the last five years		View
2.4.2Average percentage of fulltime teachers with
Ph.D./D.Sc./D.Lit./DM/M Ch/DNB in super specialities /other PG
degrees (like MD/ MS/ MDS etc.,) in Health Sciences (like MD/ MS/
MDS etc.,) for recognition as Ph.D guides as per the eligibility criteria
stipulated by the Regulatory Councils/Affiliating Universities.		View
2.4.3Average Teaching experience of fulltime teachers in number of years
(data for the preceding academic year)		View
2.4.4Average percentage of teachers trained for development and delivery
of e-content / e-courses during the last 5 years		View
2.4.5Average Percentage of fulltime teachers who received awards and recognitions for excellence in teaching, student mentoring, scholarships, professional achievements and academic leadership at State, National, International levels from Government / Government-recognized agencies / registered professional associations / academies during the last five yearsView
2.5.1The Institution adheres to the academic calendar for the conduct of
Continuous Internal Evaluation and ensures that it is robust and
transparent		View
2.5.2Mechanism to deal with examination-related grievances is transparent, time-bound and efficientView
2.5.3Reforms in the process and procedure in the conduct of evaluation/examination; including the automation of the examination
system		View
2.5.4The Institution provides opportunities to students for midcourse
improvement of performance through specific interventions		View
2.6.1The Institution has stated the learning outcomes (generic and
programme-specific) and graduate attributes as per the provisions of
the Regulatory bodies and the University;which are communicated to
the students and teachers through the website and other documents		View
2.6.2Incremental performance in Pass percentage of final year students in
the last five years		View
2.6.3The teaching learning and assessment processes of the Institution are
aligned with the stated learning outcomes.		View
2.6.4Presence and periodicity of parent-teachers meetings, remedial
measures undertaken and outcome analysis		View
2.7.1Online student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning processView